« If the Army sees the potential in Facebook, why not schools? | Main | Blog break »

July 01, 2009

Comments

Ewan,

I'm hoping that one of the sessions at the PICamp (political innovation camp) strand of NESTA's 'Reboot Britain' conference is going to provide a springboard for the launch of a obstacle-removing campaign in the public / voluntary sector.

Details are here:
http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/06/30/never-place-100-of-the-blame-for-failure-upon-the-shoulders-of-someone-with-a-veto/

BTW, thanks for the inspriation behind the 'PICamp' name - we's have had to settle for something less concise without your help on the domain front ;-)

Concerning censorship and education, I understand that censorship occurs in schools to protect the students and keep them safe from online predators who would pounce on children giving out to much personal information. However, most students have unsupervised Internet access when at home, wouldn't it be wiser to teach students how to safely use the web instead of blocking all access to sites that "might have" inappropriate material, regardless of the plethora of material that could be or is educational on that website? Should teachers be trusted to preview sites and determine on their own the educational value. What about using Facebook to talk with soldiers and the educational value there? What about the countless news videos that stream across YouTube(for example the Iranian type)? Should teachers decide or should the IT department or the district simply block access? What are your thoughts?

aaaw....

i have to say censorship is very much needed nowadays

children of any age can access the internet

and there are a lot of sites that are not suitable for them

i think they have the right to be unresonably strict :(

The comments to this entry are closed.

The long and short of it

All About Ewan

  • | Talking | Follow my shenanigans on Twitter
  • CV Resume | Cuttings | Best Of The Rest

Ones I read every day

Statcounter

Subscribe to this site