"Community is a larger loose group with a common background defined in more focus by a smaller group with a goal who act."
I just came up with that in response to a question around the future of professional development on Scotland's national intranet, Glow. I was quite happy with it. What would you add? (In 140 characters, of course ;-)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Ewan McIntosh is a teacher, speaker and investor, regarded as one of Europe’s foremost experts in digital media for public services.
His company, NoTosh Limited, invests in tech startups and film on behalf of public and private investors, works with those companies to build their creative businesses, and takes the lessons learnt from the way these people work back into schools and universities across the world.
Do you worry that your school or district could better harness its people, digital technology or physical space? Do you want some actionable inspiration, a mentor for a learning journey with your staff?
In a keynote or masterclass we can give them concrete ideas based on experience, enthusiasm fired by a vision of what can be, and backup before and after to make it happen for them.
Ewan McIntosh's edu.blogs.com by Ewan McIntosh & NoTosh Limited
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 UK: Scotland License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://edu.blogs.com/edublogs/copyright.html
Strangely enough, thats almost Wegerif & Mercer's definition of a community of practice :-)
Posted by: Jaye Richards-Hill | November 18, 2010 at 12:37 PM
hmm-- Community -- For me it is a group of people, connected through common geography or common technology-- who share mutual interest, and who actively act together to achieve common goals.
Posted by: sandy fivecoat | November 18, 2010 at 08:28 PM
Common background? With hierarchy built in? I don't think so.
I really don't think community can be defined in 140 characters (if it can be defined at all).
Posted by: Stephen Downes | November 18, 2010 at 09:34 PM
"Common background? With hierarchy built in? I don't think so."
Well, that's less than 140 chs ;-) You're right that 'common background' is uneasy, especially when you consider the incredibly varied backgrounds of the people who live in my community (and probably yours, too). But they all share something whether they like it or not: geography, language, desire to live in this place or work at that place... So I still feel there is some thread (or threads) of commonality.
Hierarchy built in? Absolutely not. I think the hierarchy (ies) get decided by elites on behalf of people who they think will believe in them. There are often several of these elites working on behalf of the same people, too, when we think about it. In the end, the engagement of those 90% or 99% of disengaged people occurs when action is taken by those elites with which the vast majority disagree.
These are, as you'll have guessed, just some initial ramblings. One I'd like to spend some time exploring further/ Any research from the streams of it out there that outlines different understandings of the term 'community'?
Posted by: Ewan McIntosh | November 18, 2010 at 10:07 PM
Common background, common geography, common technology are all too limiting - shared interest covers all communities.
I see what you're getting at with the last bit - you have to define yourself, or be defined, to become a 'community', but actually there can be a number of small groups, within and outside a 'community' with a goal to act(can be the elite, and others) - A community can also be benign, or passive. 'With a goal to act', is becoming an 'interest group' of some sort, which is a type of community, but not all communities.
Why do you want to define community? Where has this question come from?
Posted by: Marcus Belben | November 19, 2010 at 09:16 AM